Iran on the Brink: Economic Collapse, Mass Protests, and Imminent Military Action

Watch the Episode

Video originally published on January 7, 2026.

The Islamic Republic of Iran faces its most severe crisis in decades, as a catastrophic economic collapse triggers nationwide protests that dwarf previous uprisings. With the Iranian rial having lost eighty percent of its value in a year, inflation spiraling out of control, and over 350 protests erupting across twenty-eight of the country's thirty-one provinces, the regime appears to be losing its grip on power. Unlike the ideologically-driven Mahsa Amini protests of 2022-2023, the current unrest is fueled by universal economic desperation that affects all segments of Iranian society, including the security forces tasked with suppressing dissent. As the death toll rises and the regime oscillates between appeasement and brutal crackdowns, Iran's adversaries are positioning for action. Israel has reportedly approved military strike plans that could be executed within forty-eight hours, while the United States has rapidly repositioned elite special operations forces to the Middle East just days after its regime-change operation in Venezuela. With Iran's air defenses crippled from last year's Twelve-Day War, its proxy network dismantled, and Supreme Leader Khamenei reportedly preparing an escape plan to Russia, the forty-seven-year-old Islamic Republic may be entering its final days.

Key Takeaways

Iran is experiencing its worst crisis since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, driven by economic collapse and nationwide protests.

The Iranian rial has devalued by approximately eighty percent in one year, now trading at 1.4 million to one US dollar.

Over 350 protests have occurred across twenty-eight of Iran's thirty-one provinces since December 28, 2025, with at least thirty-five deaths and over 1,200 detentions reported.

Unlike previous protests focused on social issues, the current unrest is driven by economic desperation that unifies Iranians across political and social divides, including security forces and regime supporters.

Israel has reportedly approved military strike plans that could be executed imminently, with Netanyahu briefing the Trump administration on plans for major strikes.

The United States has rapidly repositioned elite special operations forces, including Delta Force and Night Stalkers, to the Middle East following the Venezuela regime-change operation.

A Year of Compounding Crises

To understand why Iran's current crisis represents an existential threat to the regime, it is essential to examine the catastrophic year that preceded it. Throughout 2025, Iran endured a series of devastating setbacks that systematically weakened the pillars supporting the Islamic Republic. The year's defining event was the Twelve-Day War with Israel in June, a conflict that, while not resulting in regime change, left Iran's defense apparatus fundamentally crippled. The war inflicted severe damage on Iran's air defense systems, missile stockpiles and production facilities, and nuclear program infrastructure—damage that will require years to repair fully.

Simultaneously, Iran faced an intensifying water crisis as desperately needed rainfall failed to materialize, compounding existing resource scarcity issues. The regime was forced to watch helplessly as its carefully constructed international network of proxy organizations was systematically dismantled. Hamas and Hezbollah, two of Iran's most important regional assets, suffered severe setbacks that dramatically reduced Tehran's ability to project power and influence across the Middle East. These external defeats had profound internal consequences, as public morale deteriorated across the political spectrum. Hardliners began losing faith in the regime's competence and strength, while opposition elements lost their traditional fear of the authorities—a psychological shift with profound implications for social control.

This accumulation of crises left Iran in an exceptionally vulnerable position when economic disaster struck in the final days of 2025. The regime lacked the military deterrent capability, international support network, natural resources, and domestic legitimacy that might have allowed it to weather the storm. Instead, each previous setback amplified the impact of the next, creating a cascading failure that has brought the Islamic Republic to the brink of collapse.

Economic Catastrophe and Currency Collapse

The immediate trigger for Iran's current crisis was a rapid and severe devaluation of the Iranian rial, a currency that had been struggling for years but reached unprecedented lows in recent weeks. As of early January 2026, the rial is trading at 1.4 million to one against the US dollar—a staggering devaluation of approximately eighty percent compared to just one year earlier. This currency collapse has had immediate and devastating effects on ordinary Iranians' purchasing power and quality of life.

Even according to official government statistics, which typically understate the severity of economic problems, inflation in Iran has spiked to approximately forty-two percent annually. The reality for essential goods is even worse, with food price inflation exceeding seventy percent. Basic necessities have become unaffordable for vast segments of the population, creating acute hardship across Iranian society. In a decision that demonstrated either remarkable tone-deafness or complete desperation, the regime chose this moment of maximum economic pain to raise prices on subsidized gasoline, one of the few remaining economic supports for struggling citizens.

The economic crisis affects not just the general population but also the security apparatus and regime supporters who have traditionally formed the backbone of the Islamic Republic's power structure. Soldiers, internal security forces, and local religious leaders who support the regime are experiencing the same economic devastation as everyone else, undermining their motivation to defend a system that can no longer provide for them. This universal nature of the economic suffering represents a fundamental difference from previous crises that divided Iranian society along ideological or social lines.

From Protest to Nationwide Uprising

The initial response to Iran's economic catastrophe began modestly, with relatively small numbers of merchants taking to the streets of Tehran to protest the currency collapse. What distinguished this moment from countless previous instances of dissent was the regime's failure to respond with its characteristic immediate and harsh repression. When Tehran's street sellers were not met with instant reprisals, they returned the next day in greater numbers. The day after that, the crowds grew again, and the pattern of escalation had begun.

Similar acts of defiance began appearing in other Iranian cities and then spread to the rural countryside, where government crackdowns have historically been most severe. Within a week, the protests had transformed into a nationwide phenomenon. According to the Critical Threats Project's daily update from Monday, January 5, 2026, Iran has experienced over 350 protests across twenty-eight of the country's thirty-one provinces since the protests began on December 28, 2025. This geographic breadth and sustained momentum represent an unprecedented challenge to the regime's authority.

The current protests differ fundamentally from the mass uprisings of 2022 and 2023 that followed the death of Mahsa Amini in the custody of Iran's morality police. Those earlier protests centered on religion, social conservatism, and belief or rejection of the regime's ideological values—issues that divided Iranian society and allowed the regime to mobilize its conservative base against protesters. The current unrest, by contrast, is driven by acute economic concerns that transcend ideological boundaries. Spiraling inflation, currency collapse, and government mismanagement threaten to destroy lives regardless of what people believe, creating a unifying cause that bridges traditional political divides.

This economic focus means the protest movement can draw on both the burning rage from Iran's political opposition, which remains bottled up after the failure of the Mahsa Amini protests, and the frustration of traditionally pro-regime elements who are also suffering economically. Protesters have been encouraged by signs of regime weakness, including the morality police's increasingly permissive approach to enforcement—a change that all citizens recognize the ayatollahs would never allow if they retained their former power.

Escalation and Regime Response

By early January, the protests had begun devolving into intermittent riots, running clashes with police, and vandalism and attacks against state institutions. The first two fatalities were confirmed by state media on January 1, after security forces opened fire in some areas. The regime's response shifted dramatically toward a much heavier hand, though it attempted to maintain a public distinction between peaceful protests and riots.

Supreme Leader Khamenei openly instructed security forces that "rioters should be put in their place," while the nation's judiciary chief called for "no mercy" against rioters. The actions of Iran's security forces changed to match this rhetoric. As of Tuesday, January 6, the death toll stood at thirty-five or more according to international activists, with over 1,200 people detained, at least one hospital raided, and regime forces alleging that "organized cells" are working to exploit the unrest.

Despite the clear end of attempts at appeasement, the regime appears to be in a state of panic. Leaked directives from Iran's Central Bank called for all Iranian banks and financial institutions to prepare for mass shutdowns, infrastructure collapse, and a regime-wide crisis. In a desperate attempt to address public anger, the regime announced a monthly cash-payment system for citizens despite its severe financial troubles. Most stunningly, President Masoud Pezeshkian delivered a televised speech that seemed to signal the crisis may already be beyond control, stating: "We should not expect the government to handle all of this alone. The government simply does not have that capacity." This public admission of governmental incapacity from Iran's president represents an extraordinary acknowledgment of regime weakness.

Israel Prepares for Military Action

While Iran's internal crisis intensifies, its global adversaries have recognized this as the moment they have been waiting for and are actively turning up the heat. Israel is leading the charge, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government signaling for months that a renewed conflict with Iran could be imminent. Netanyahu recently traveled to the United States to brief the Trump administration on plans for another round of major strikes, with Trump signaling his support for the idea—a crucial endorsement from Israel's most important international backer.

According to Israeli officials, Iran has been working to rebuild and reconstitute groups like Hezbollah abroad, repair its missile-production cycle, and potentially resume its nuclear program. Israel has taken an acute interest in Iran's growing protests, with high-level officials signaling their nation will support the protest movement. Recently, Israel has increased pressure on Iranian allies abroad, renewing its campaign of airstrikes against Hezbollah and Hamas targets across Lebanon starting Monday, after Lebanese officials missed an Israel-imposed deadline to disarm Hezbollah independently.

Open-source intelligence reports, citing Israeli sources, indicate that Netanyahu may have approved a military attack plan that could go into effect as soon as the next forty-eight hours. Israel's military appears to have moved into a new state of high alert. The timing of potential Israeli action coincides with Iran's moment of maximum vulnerability, when its attention and resources are consumed by internal crisis and its military capabilities remain degraded from previous conflicts.

American Military Positioning and the Venezuela Precedent

The latest developments from the United States may represent an even greater threat to Iran, especially in the wake of America's brazen regime-change operation in Venezuela just days earlier. After the capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro, Trump and his inner circle publicly warned world nations to pay attention to what had transpired. According to Iranian officials speaking to Reuters, there is real fear in Tehran that Iran will become "the next victim of Trump's aggressive foreign policy."

Last week, on the day before the Venezuela operation took place, Trump took to social media to threaten that if the Iranian regime killed "peaceful protesters," the United States was "locked and loaded and ready to go." That statement was issued when the reported death toll in Iran was still in the single digits; as of this writing, the count stands at thirty-five, including minors—well past the threshold Trump appeared to establish.

Over the last several days, over a dozen American strategic airlifters have crossed the Atlantic, first to Britain and then further eastward. According to reports from the UK Defence Journal, many of those airlifters are carrying helicopters operated by the Night Stalkers, the elite special-operations unit that flew Delta Force commandos into the heart of Caracas just days ago. Delta Force has reportedly pivoted to the Middle East as well, with other elite American units in Europe, including Army Rangers and air-assault forces, being repositioned rapidly.

Flight-tracking data has shown US and British refueling tankers and airlifters all headed into the Middle East, while open-source analysts have suggested that an unexplained blackout across Greek and Cypriot airspace on Monday may have been intended to mask the movement of US assets. American intelligence aircraft have been operating continuously off the Iranian coast, and the commander of US CENTCOM has made the long journey to Bahrain. According to the outlet Kurdistan24, Delta Force operators are currently taking positions along Iraq's borders with Syria and Jordan, possibly with the short-term objective of dealing with Iran-backed militias in the area that are refusing calls to disarm, although these reports remain somewhat unclear.

Regional Complications and Syria Concerns

Adding another layer of complexity to the situation, a series of reports suggest trouble in Syria, where Israel has reportedly warned the nation's transitional leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, that Iran is planning to kill him. Recent rumors suggest al-Sharaa himself was lightly wounded in a recent clash at the Presidential Palace in Damascus, while Israeli military sources have shared anonymously that they are preparing for Iran to launch an attack somewhere across the Middle East. These developments indicate that a sudden crisis, either involving al-Sharaa or otherwise, could prompt an immediate military response from Jerusalem.

The Syria situation demonstrates how Iran's weakened position creates opportunities for its adversaries across multiple theaters simultaneously. With Iran's proxy network dismantled and its ability to project power severely constrained, actors across the region are moving to consolidate gains and eliminate remaining Iranian influence. Each of these regional developments further isolates Iran and creates additional pressure points that the regime must monitor and respond to, even as its attention and resources are consumed by the domestic crisis.

Iran's Military Vulnerability and Deterrence Failure

Perhaps most critically for the Iranian regime, the ayatollahs have no reason to believe they could deter action from either Israel or the United States in their current weakened state. While Iran recently received a transfer of Iskander missiles from Russia—ballistic missiles with up to a seven-hundred-kilogram warhead and up to a five-hundred-kilometer range—these weapons lack the range to reach Israel. They could potentially strike US assets in Qatar, Bahrain, or Kuwait, force the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, or attack critical oil infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, or other Gulf nations, but Iran has nowhere near the firepower needed to deal with the overwhelming retaliation that would follow such actions.

Iran's air defenses were thoroughly devastated in the Twelve-Day War with Israel and the exchanges that preceded it, leaving the country with basically no means to protect itself from an imminent aerial attack. Its stockpiles of long-range missiles and drones have been seriously diminished, along with much of their launch infrastructure. Israel's decision to destroy key facilities in Iran's missile-production supply chain means Tehran cannot replenish its stockpiles anytime soon. Its international proxy forces are in no position to help, and its ground forces are useless against an Israeli military with no desire to face it on land.

This military vulnerability represents a complete reversal from Iran's traditional deterrence posture, which relied on the threat of regional escalation, proxy attacks, and missile strikes to prevent direct military action against the regime. With these capabilities degraded or eliminated, Iran faces the prospect of attack with no effective means of defense or retaliation—and all of this would be challenging enough even if Iranian society were not in a state of total upheaval.

Khamenei's Reported Escape Plan

Publicly, Iran has responded to external threats with its usual defiant rhetoric. In remarks on Tuesday, Supreme Leader Khamenei said his nation does not believe Israel will avoid seeking confrontation, and that in response, Iran will not limit its response to a future act of Israeli aggression. Khamenei even threatened that Iran could launch a first strike if it believed its interests or sovereignty had come under sufficient threat. On Monday, Iranian state media reported the nation had received the transfer of Iskander missiles from Russia, attempting to project continued military capability.

Privately, however, it appears Khamenei may have very different plans. A recent report in The Times, citing Western intelligence sources, suggests he has concocted a plan to flee to Russia if protests begin to overwhelm Iranian security forces. According to that report, Khamenei and up to twenty aides and family members will fly straight to Moscow on a plane filled with cash and other assets, in a plan informed by Bashar al-Assad's actions during the collapse of the Syrian regime in 2024.

The existence of such an escape plan, if accurate, represents a stunning acknowledgment by Iran's supreme leader that regime collapse is a realistic possibility. It suggests that despite public bravado, the regime's leadership recognizes the severity of the crisis and is preparing for the worst-case scenario. The parallel to Assad's flight from Syria is particularly ominous, as that regime's collapse occurred with stunning speed once the tipping point was reached.

Convergence of Crises

Right now, the walls are closing in on the ayatollahs from all sides—not passively, not by accident, but because the many forces that would like to see Iran's regime fall have all recognized that this is their moment. The nation's protest movement is taking control of streets across the country, Israel is poised and ready to engage in all-out conflict, and the United States has made it abundantly clear that it will not be held back by any international limit besides its own ambition.

The convergence of internal uprising and external military threat creates a scenario where each crisis amplifies the other. Military strikes would further destabilize an already chaotic internal situation, while domestic unrest prevents the regime from effectively responding to external threats. The regime's security forces must choose between suppressing domestic protests and preparing for external attack, while the population's fear of the regime—the psychological foundation of authoritarian control—has evaporated in the face of economic desperation and visible regime weakness.

Iran is on the brink of collapse, and its leaders, its citizens, and its enemies all seem to know it. Predictions of the Islamic Republic's fall have been common over the decades, with actual instances of collapse numbering precisely zero—but the current crisis differs in scale, scope, and timing from anything the regime has faced before. The combination of economic catastrophe, nationwide protests, military vulnerability, external military threats, and visible regime panic creates conditions fundamentally different from previous challenges to the Islamic Republic's survival. Whether the regime can pull back from the brink remains uncertain, but the window for doing so appears to be rapidly closing as military action looms and protests continue to spread.

Related Coverage

FAQ

What triggered the current protests in Iran?

The immediate trigger was a rapid and severe devaluation of the Iranian rial, which lost approximately eighty percent of its value in one year, now trading at 1.4 million to one US dollar. Inflation spiked to around forty-two percent annually, with food price inflation exceeding seventy percent. The regime's decision to raise prices on subsidized gasoline during this period of maximum economic pain further inflamed public anger.

How are the current protests different from the 2022-2023 Mahsa Amini protests?

The Mahsa Amini protests centered on religion, social conservatism, and ideological values, which divided Iranian society and allowed the regime to mobilize its conservative base against protesters. The current protests are driven by acute economic concerns that affect all segments of society equally, including soldiers, security forces, and regime supporters, creating a unifying cause that bridges traditional political divides.

What is the scale of the current protests in Iran?

According to the Critical Threats Project's daily update from January 5, 2026, Iran has experienced over 350 protests across twenty-eight of its thirty-one provinces since the protests began on December 28, 2025. At least thirty-five people have been killed and over 1,200 detained, with at least one hospital raided by security forces.

Why is Iran militarily vulnerable right now?

Iran's air defenses, missile stockpiles, production facilities, and nuclear program infrastructure were severely damaged during the June 2025 Twelve-Day War with Israel. Israel also destroyed key facilities in Iran's missile-production supply chain, preventing Tehran from replenishing its stockpiles. Iran's proxy network, including Hamas and Hezbollah, has been dismantled, leaving the country with no effective means of defense or retaliation against aerial attack.

What military actions are Israel and the United States reportedly preparing?

Open-source intelligence reports indicate Netanyahu may have approved a military attack plan that could go into effect within forty-eight hours. The United States has repositioned elite special operations forces including Delta Force and Night Stalkers to the Middle East, with over a dozen strategic airlifters crossing the Atlantic. US intelligence aircraft are operating continuously off the Iranian coast, and the CENTCOM commander has traveled to Bahrain.

What is the reported Khamenei escape plan?

According to a report in The Times citing Western intelligence sources, Supreme Leader Khamenei has prepared a plan to flee to Russia if protests overwhelm Iranian security forces. He and up to twenty aides and family members would fly to Moscow on a plane filled with cash and other assets, in a plan modeled on Bashar al-Assad's flight from Syria during the collapse of the Syrian regime in 2024.

What role did the Venezuela operation play in the Iran situation?

The US regime-change operation in Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of dictator Nicolas Maduro, has heightened fears in Tehran. Iranian officials told Reuters they fear becoming the next victim of Trump's aggressive foreign policy. The same elite forces used in Venezuela, including Delta Force and Night Stalkers, have reportedly pivoted to the Middle East. Trump also warned that the US was 'locked and loaded' if Iran killed peaceful protesters.

What weapons did Iran recently receive from Russia and do they change the balance?

Iran received a transfer of Iskander ballistic missiles from Russia, which carry up to a seven-hundred-kilogram warhead with up to a five-hundred-kilometer range. However, these missiles lack the range to reach Israel. While they could strike US assets in the Persian Gulf, threaten the Strait of Hormuz, or attack Gulf oil infrastructure, Iran lacks the overall firepower to withstand the overwhelming retaliation that would follow such actions.

Sources

About the Author

Jackson Reed

Jackson Reed creates and presents analysis focused on military doctrine, strategic competition, and conflict dynamics.

About the Team →